LNG is even worse than coal

Podcast
Tagesaktuelles Programm
  • LNG is even worse than coal
    26:43
audio
12:37 Min.
Die Situation der Kinder in Gaza: Eine humanitäre Krise
audio
14:55 Min.
Die Rolle der Wirtschaft im Wahlkampf zur Bundestagswahl 2025
audio
19:28 Min.
Neue Diskurse und die Veränderungen in der Berichterstattung über den Nah-Ost-Konflikt
audio
05:52 Min.
Der Anschlag auf General Kirillow - ein Kommentar
audio
11:46 Min.
Perspektive Ost
audio
13:18 Min.
Gefängnistheater "aufBruch"
audio
10:44 Min.
Reporter ohne Grenzen: Jahresbilanz 2024
audio
04:08 Min.
Neonazis im Harz
audio
12:29 Min.
Rumänien nach den Wahlen
audio
14:37 Min.
Der Verkauf der Reilstraße 78 geht in die nächste Runde

That is the conclusion of a new study by Robert Howarth, the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Cornell University in New York. His study on the greenhouse footprint was published just weeks before the World LNG Summit in Berlin started, where different corporations are pushing for more LNG being used as a so-called bridge technology to cover energy needs during the European transition to renewable energies. While it comes as no surprise that LNG will also further add to climate change as a fossil fuel, the fact that it is even worse than coal, from which Germany has started transitioning away much quicker, provides facts to support the argument that the European focus on LNG as a source of energy is a massive misjudgment. In conversation with Radio Corax, Robert Howarth explains what the results of the study mean and which aspects surround this issue.

You can read the full study here: https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.1934

Bilder

LNG is even worse than coal
0 x 0px

Schreibe einen Kommentar